Discuss the work of the Committee of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future

Discuss the work of the Committee of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future

Discuss the work of the Committee of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future

Question

Unsatisfactory

0.00%

2

Less Than Satisfactory

75.00%

3

Satisfactory

79.00%

4

Good

89.00%

5

Excellent

100.00%

80.0 %Content

15.0 % Discuss the work of the Committee of the Robert Wood
Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing.

Does not demonstrate knowledge of
the concept or its role. Fails to identify the impact of the Robert Wood
Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing.

Demonstrates minimal knowledge of
subject. Does not adequately visualize or justify the work of the Committee
of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing.

Demonstrates a moderate knowledge
of the subject. Recognizes the basic ideas. Misinterprets evidence on the
committee’s initiative.

Demonstrates good knowledge of the
subject. Correctly describes the committee’s initiative. Justifies some of
the impacts on the Future of Nursing.

Demonstrates a full and deep
knowledge of subject. Develops and explains an informed position on the
committee’s initiative, integrates and justifies the impact on the Future of
Nursing

20.0 % Identify the importance of the IOM FON report related
to the nursing workforce.

Does not demonstrate knowledge of
the concept or its role. Fails to identify the importance of the IOM FON
report related to the nursing workforce.

Demonstrates minimal knowledge of
the subject. Does not adequately visualize or justify the importance of the
IOM FON report related to the nursing workforce.

Demonstrates a moderate knowledge
of the subject. Recognizes the basic ideas. Misinterprets evidence on the
importance of the IOM FON report related to the nursing workforce.

Demonstrates good knowledge of the
subject. Correctly describes importance of the IOM FON report related to the
nursing workforce.

Demonstrates a full and deep
knowledge of the subject. Develops and explains the importance of the IOM FON
report, integrates and justifies the importance of the IOM FON report related
to the nursing workforce.

15.0 % Discuss the intent of the Future of Nursing Campaign
for Action.

Does not demonstrate knowledge of
the concept or its role. Fails to identify the intent of the Future of
Nursing Campaign for Action.

Demonstrates minimal knowledge of
the subject. Does not adequately visualize or identify the intent of the
Future of Nursing Campaign for Action.

Demonstrates a moderate knowledge
of the subject. Recognizes the basic ideas. Misinterprets evidence on the
intent of the Future of Nursing Campaign for Action.

Demonstrates good knowledge of the
subject. Correctly describes the intent of the Future of Nursing Campaign for
Action.

Demonstrates a full and deep
knowledge of the subject. Develops and explains the intent of the Future of
Nursing Campaign for Action, integrates and justifies the intent of the
Future of Nursing Campaign for Action.

15.0 % Identify the rationale of state-based action
coalitions.

Does not demonstrate knowledge of
the concept or its role. Fails to identify the rationale of state-based
action coalitions.

Demonstrates minimal knowledge of
the subject. Does not adequately identify the rationale of state-based action
coalitions.

Demonstrates a moderate knowledge
of the subject. Recognizes the basic ideas. Misinterprets evidence on the
rationale of state-based action coalitions.

Demonstrates good knowledge of the
subject. Correctly identifies the rationale of state-based action coalitions.

Demonstrates a full and deep
knowledge of the subject. Develops and explains and identifies the rationale
of state-based action coalitions and justifies a rationale for state-based
action coalitions.

15.0 % Discuss one state-based action coalition and two
initiatives..

Does not demonstrate knowledge of
the concept or its role. Fails to identify one state-based action coalition
and two initiatives

Demonstrates minimal knowledge of
the subject. Does not adequately identify one state-based action coalition
and two initiatives.

Demonstrates a moderate knowledge
of the subject. Recognizes the basic ideas. Identifies but misinterprets one
state-based action coalition and two initiatives.

Demonstrates good knowledge of the
subject. Correctly identifies one state-based action coalition and two
initiatives.

Demonstrates a full and deep
knowledge of the subject. Develops and explains the one state-based action
coalition and two initiatives, integrates and justifies one state-based
action coalition and two initiatives.

15.0 %Organization and
Effectiveness

5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible
overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are
insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are
apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear
and forecast the development of the paper. Is descriptive and reflective of
the arguments and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are
comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper.
Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions

Paragraphs and transitions
consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between
paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and
scope. Organization is disjointed.

Some paragraphs and transitions
may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness.
Some degree of organization is evident.

Paragraphs are generally
competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in
their relationships to each other.

A logical progression of ideas
between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and
cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to
purpose.

There is a sophisticated
construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each
other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph
structure is seamless.

5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation,
grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive
enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice
and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical
errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register),
sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos
are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence
structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of
mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures
and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of
standard, written, academic English.

5.0 %Format

2.0 % Paper Format (1- inch
margins;12-point-font;double-spaced;Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier)

Template is not used appropriately
or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Template is used, but some
elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is
apparent.

Template is used, and formatting
is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Template is fully used; There are
virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing
and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate
to assignment)

No reference page is included. No
citations are used.

Reference page is present.
Citations are inconsistently used.

Reference page is included and
lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented,
although some errors may be present.

Reference page is present and
fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU
style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference
page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

100 % Total Weightage

Discuss the work of the Committee of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future